2023-09-20

# Frequency-constrained substring complexity

## Publication

### Publication

*Presented at the 30th International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval, SPIRE 2023 (September 2023), Pisa, Italy*

We introduce the notion of frequency-constrained substring complexity. For any finite string, it counts the distinct substrings of the string per length and frequency class. For a string x of length n and a partition of [n] in $$\tau $$ intervals, $$\mathcal {I}=I_1,\ldots,I_\tau $$, the frequency-constrained substring complexity of x is the function $$f:{x,\mathcal {I}}(i,j)$$ that maps i, j to the number of distinct substrings of length i of x occurring at least $$\alpha _j$$ and at most $$\beta _j$$ times in x, where $$I:j=[\alpha _j,\beta _j]$$. We extend this notion as follows. For a string x, a dictionary $$\mathcal {D}$$ of d strings (documents), and a partition of [d] in $$\tau $$ intervals $$I:1,\ldots,I_\tau $$, we define a 2D array $$S=S[1\mathinner {.\,.}|x|,1\mathinner {.\,.}\tau ]$$ as follows: S[i, j] is the number of distinct substrings of length i of x occurring in at least $$\alpha _j$$ and at most $$\beta _j$$ documents, where $$I:j=[\alpha _j,\beta _j]$$. Array S can thus be seen as the distribution of the substring complexity of x into $$\tau $$ document frequency classes. We show that after a linear-time preprocessing of $$\mathcal {D}$$, for any x and any partition of [d] in $$\tau $$ intervals given online, array S can be computed in near-optimal $$\mathcal {O}(|x| \tau \log \log d)$$ time.

Additional Metadata | |
---|---|

, , | |

doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43980-3_28 | |

Lecture Notes in Computer Science | |

30th International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval, SPIRE 2023 | |

Organisation | Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam (CWI), The Netherlands |

Pissis, S, Shekelyan, M, Liu, C, & Loukides, G. (2023). Frequency-constrained substring complexity. In
Proceedings of the International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval (pp. 345–352). doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43980-3_28 |