Within journalistic editorial processes, disclosing AI usage is currently limited to simplistic labels, which misses the nuance of how humans and AI collaborated on a news article. Through co-design sessions (N=10), we elicited 69 disclosure designs and implemented four prototypes that visually disclose human–AI collaboration in journalism. We then ran a within-subjects lab study (N=32) to examine how disclosure visualizations (Textual, Role-based Timeline, Task-based Timeline, Chatbot) and collaboration ratios (Primarily Human vs. Primarily AI) influenced visualization perceptions, gaze patterns, and post-experience responses. We found that textual disclosures were least effective in communicating human-AI collaboration, whereas Chatbot offered the most in-depth information. Furthermore, while role-based timelines amplified AI contribution in primarily human articles, task-based timeline shifted perceptions toward human involvement in primarily AI articles. We contribute Human-AI collaboration disclosure visualizations and their evaluation, and cautionary considerations on how visualizations can alter perceptions of AI’s actual role during news article creation.

, , , ,
Association for Computing Machinery
doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791288
CHI 2026: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Distributed and Interactive Systems

Kusters, A., Prajod, P., César Garcia, P. S.& El Ali, A. (2026). More human or more AI? Visualizing human-AI collaboration disclosures in journalistic news production. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 729:1–729:22.https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791288