The no-free-lunch theorems promote a skeptical conclusion that all possible machine learning algorithms equally lack justification. But how could this leave room for a learning theory, that shows that some algorithms are better than others? Drawing parallels to the philosophy of induction, we point out that the no-free-lunch results presuppose a conception of learning algorithms as purely data-driven. On this conception, every algorithm must have an inherent inductive bias, that wants justification. We argue that many standard learning algorithms should rather be understood as model-dependent: in each application they also require for input a model, representing a bias. Generic algorithms themselves, they can be given a model-relative justification.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
, , | |
doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03233-1 | |
Synthese | |
Sterkenburg, T.F, & Grünwald, P.D. (2021). The no-free-lunch theorems of supervised learning. Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03233-1
|