Pre-congestion notification (PCN) protects inelastic traffic by using feedback on network link loads on and acting upon this accordingly. These actions comprise to admission control and termination of flows. Two PCN architectures have been defined by IETF: the centralized and decentralized PCN architecture. The decentralized PCN architecture has received much attention in the literature whereas the centralized PCN architecture has not. In the decentralized architecture, feedback is sent from the egress nodes to ingress nodes, which then take and apply decisions regarding admission of new flows and/or termination of ongoing flows. Signaling occurs only between ingress and egress nodes. In the centralized architecture these decisions are made at a central node, which requires proper signaling for action and information exchange between the central node and the egress and ingress nodes. This signaling has been suggested by other authors, but is not fully defined yet. Our contribution is twofold. We define signaling in the centralized PCN architecture focussing on flow termination, which completes the definition of the signaling in the centralized PCN architecture. Secondly, we run extensive simulations showing that the proposed signaling works well and that the performances of the centralized PCN and the decentralized PCN architectures are similar. Hence, it is expected that results from existing research on the effectiveness of decentralized PCN are also valid when the centralized PCN architecture is used.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Centralized decision, Flow termination, Point pre-congestion notification, Signaling, Software defined networking
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2017.08.010
Journal Computer Networks
Citation
Wetzels, F.P.M, van den Berg, J.L, Bosman, J.W, & van der Mei, R.D. (2017). Flow termination signaling in the centralized pre-congestion notification architecture. Computer Networks, 127, 233–242. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2017.08.010