The aim of this paper is to show that a high-order discretization can be used to improve the convergence of a multilevel Monte Carlo method for elliptic partial differential equations with lognormal random coefficients in combination with the multigrid solution method. To demonstrate this, we consider a fourth-order accurate finite-volume discretization. With the help of the Matérn family of covariance functions, we simulate the coefficient field with different degrees of smoothness. The idea behind using a fourth-order scheme is to capture the additional regularity in the solution introduced due to higher smoothness of the random field. Second-order schemes previously utilized for these types of problems are not able to fully exploit this additional regularity. We also propose a practical way of combining a full multigrid solver with the multilevel Monte Carlo estimator constructed on the same mesh hierarchy. Through this integration, one full multigrid solve at any level provides a valid sample for all the preceding Monte Carlo levels. The numerical results show that the fourth-order multilevel estimator consistently outperforms the second-order variant. In addition, we observe an asymptotic gain for the standard Monte Carlo estimator.

Additional Metadata
Keywords stochastic partial differential equations, groundwater flow, random fields, fourth-order discretization, full multigrid, multilevel Monte Carlo
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2016018677
Journal International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification
Project Uncertainty Quantication in Hydraulic Fracturing using Multi-Level Monte Carlo and Multigrid
Grant This work was funded by the The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO); grant id nwo/14CSER004 - Uncertainty Quantication in Hydraulic Fracturing using Multi-Level Monte Carlo and Multigrid
Citation
Kumar, P, Oosterlee, C.W, & Dwight, R.P. (2017). A multigrid multilevel Monte Carlo method using high-order finite-volume scheme for lognormal diffusion problems. International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 7(1), 57–81. doi:10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2016018677