2014
A Novel Population-based Multi-Objective CMA-ES and the Impact of Different Constraint Handling Techniques
Publication
Publication
Presented at the
Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
The Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolutionary Strategy (CMA-ES) is a well-known, state-of-the-art optimization algorithm for single-objective real-valued problems, especially in black-box settings. Although several extensions of CMA-ES to multi-objective (MO) optimization exist, no extension incorporates a key component of the most robust and general CMA-ES variant: the association of a population with each Gaussian distribution that drives optimization. To achieve this, we use a recently introduced framework for extending population-based algorithms from single- to multi-objective optimization. We compare, using six well-known benchmark problems, the performance of the newly constructed MO-CMA-ES with existing variants and with the estimation of distribution algorithm (EDA) known as iMAMaLGaM, that is also an instance of the framework, extending the single-objective EDA iAMaLGaM to MO. Results underline the advantages of being able to use populations. Because many real-world problems have constraints, we also study the use of four constraint-handling techniques. We find that CMA-ES is typically less robust to these techniques than iAMaLGaM. Moreover, whereas we could verify that a penalty method that was previously used in literature leads to fast convergence, we also find that it has a high risk of finding only nearly, but not entirely, feasible solutions. We therefore propose that other constraint-handling techniques should be preferred in general.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
ACM | |
doi.org/10.1145/2576768.2598329 | |
Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference | |
Organisation | Intelligent and autonomous systems |
Rodrigues, S., Bauer, P., & Bosman, P. (2014). A Novel Population-based Multi-Objective CMA-ES and the Impact of Different Constraint Handling Techniques. In Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2014 (pp. 991–998). ACM. doi:10.1145/2576768.2598329 |